@Gruwup 2016
Great Reasons Us ( You There, I Here, and all visiting guests and students of learning here along with Pope Francis )
Will Unite Peace
[ ... ] ,
[ ... ] ,
[ ... ]
Awesome Kramobone Glows and Blows Playroom : Denver Colorado : United States of America
[ ... ] ,
[ ... ] ,
[ ... ]
From his private meeting with President Obama to giving the
first-ever papal address before a joint session of Congress, Pope
Francis did not shy away from politics during his three-day stop in
Washington, D.C. (Julie Percha/The Washington Post)
An excerpt from his public address broadcast worldwide live
to which this author here was watching and listening to him intently .
He said to the world to what I agree has been a part of my missing
portion of my mission work ideal - I have no fix for this
and I cannot totally be in this community work alone. This is what he
told or asked or advised us to do:
[ ... ] ,
[ ... ] ,
[ ... ]
------ All of us are quite aware of, and deeply worried by,
the disturbing social and political situation of the world today. Our
world is increasingly a place of violent conflict, hatred and brutal
atrocities, committed even in the name of God and of religion. We know
that no religion is immune from forms of individual delusion or
ideological extremism. This means that we must be especially attentive
to every type of fundamentalism, whether religious or of any other kind.
A delicate balance is required to combat violence perpetrated in the
name of a religion, an ideology or an economic system, while also
safeguarding religious freedom, intellectual freedom and individual
freedoms. But there is another temptation which we must especially guard
against: the simplistic reductionism which sees only good or evil; or,
if you will, the righteous and sinners. The contemporary world, with its
open wounds which affect so many of our brothers and sisters, demands
that we confront every form of polarization which would divide it into
these two camps. We know that in the attempt to be freed of the enemy
without, we can be tempted to feed the enemy within. To imitate the
hatred and violence of tyrants and murderers is the best way to take
their place. That is something which you, as a people, reject. Our
response must instead be one of hope and healing, of peace and justice.
We are asked to summon the courage and the intelligence to resolve
today’s many geopolitical and economic crises. Even in the developed
world, the effects of unjust structures and actions are all too
apparent. Our efforts must aim at restoring hope, righting wrongs,
maintaining commitments, and thus promoting the well-being of
individuals and of peoples. We must move forward together, as one, in a
renewed spirit of fraternity and solidarity, cooperating generously for
the common good. The challenges facing us today call for a renewal of
that spirit of cooperation, which has accomplished so much good
throughout the history of the United States. The complexity, the gravity
and the urgency of these challenges demand that we pool our resources
and talents, and resolve to support one another, with respect for our
differences and our convictions of conscience.
This is a request to cease posting or emailing anything regarding Rocky
Mountain Cares and the use of any names of staff members.
If you continue to do so I will have no choice to involve out attorney.
Rocky Mountain Cares will also no longer provider services for you.
The allaboutphilosophy : Moral Truth article [2]
suggests there are many problematic situations placed upon "Moral
Truth" and as such the article gives the conclusion suggestion that
Moral Truth cannot be absolute.
Moral Truth – Why Does It Matter?
When self-interest rules, it has a profound impact on behavior,
especially how we treat other human beings. The notion of human dignity
depends on there being objective moral truths. Instead, we can discard
people when they become troublesome or expensive.
With moral relativism, anything goes! The death of objective morality is
filled with an “anything goes” mentality. Nothing is ultimately wrong
if you can get away with it.
I will directly provide a displacement view of analyst considerations to these two quotes:
"Instead, we can discard people when they become troublesome or expensive."
"Nothing is ultimately wrong if you can get away with it."
Under a memetically active system that I conceptually hold by memespace
by domainnames, I profoundly disagree with this article's stance and
there is something of "cultural Change"
that can be placed into the record especially if there is a conflict
that has arisen from one person's [or group] actions that is of
self-interest which actually has or will harm others or strip away our
given universal human rights including our human dignity.
Let me offer the name of what I conceptually hold as possible displacement here:
"Applied Memetic Engineering Systems : a morality correctiveness model"
goal of positive memetic engineering that I call to action as...
"Great Reasons Urbans Will Unite Peace"
vs.
"Massive Mischievous Marvel Of Molding Muck"
Using the memespace by domain @realuphuman.net : @gruwup.net :
@muckeduphuman.net : @fuckeduphuman.net frankly just cannot be discarded
and will demand the attention of the offender. The key phrase "get
away with it" really cannot hold true anymore.
I have copied on this email, Cinamon Romero, your case manager and JC Goodhart , Manager of Client Services.
Regards,
Shannon Southall
Executive Director
Rocky Mountain Cares
RM Cares Pharmacy
Regards:
You do realize that you signed your letter in 3rd person -- for you cannot even represent your
own words to be your own self be wise.
Exactly to whom are you in allegiance leaderships above you to be writing
these words for on their behalf.
You are being manipulated., . Obviously, as signed you are not representing yourself.
re·gard
rəˈɡärd/
verb
3rd person present: regards
1.
consider or think of (someone or something) in a specified way.
YOU
MAY FORWARD THIS TO YOUR ATTORNEY -- WITHOUT DELAY -- -FAILURE TO
FORWARD THIS TO YOUR ATTORNEY -- YOUR STATEMENT IS A FAILED ATTEMPT TO
SILENCE ME.
My
Screen recording : This is a screen capture recording of my mobile
device that details a just placement of true consideration placed into
an email to my building manager Darrell Johnson of Chesney KleinJohn
Apartments in Denver Colorado. This is a real story - this is
considered non-fiction work of documentary form in the right of
intellectual freedom ownership of these media -- this is original
content to which there is absolutely no copyright infringements to
apply. I hold personal of responsibility for the greater good to the
public placement of this is soundly with great considerations of thought
JUST IN ALL THINGS HERE. All rights reserved.
This is an HOPWA [
Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS ] intentional formed
community-based HUD public housing subsidized housing for the support of
persons with disability, specifically HIV/AIDS.
In all true
manners, a written address to the building manager on their Facebook
page was written first expressing the matters of community chaos
observed as being over and beyond any kind of commons of decency. My
tenancy began on April 1st 2015 and the Facebook post public was shared
on July 11th 2016. However it was shared via Facebook social media, I
have my necessity of wisdom wise to file this formerly as public onto my
own information systems internet domain space. This is considered a
memespace, the folder directory containing that post -- directly as it
was shared and saved to the web remains open world visible even though I
am unable to continue to be a contributing member of respect here to
the admin of that page repressively removes me from viability by
blocking -- an unjustly reality -- in consideration of what has now
truly be able to be forced into public presentations from this received
subterfuge and pretense. a matter of documented proof to the level
that is more likely true than not of these circumstances -- a
preponderance of the evidence upon this conspiracy of harassment undue
and beyond the pale have has been intently documented -- real time --
real case - real truth.
Now one stands up for the community
wellness -- and as this is a direct health issue matter email [ screen
recording ] that I am making my stand on today.
I have a calling
for the higher class - a pillar of greatness class community standards
-- that no one cares to give me any form of a validity of my writings
for months and months as continued received harassment were being
documented.
The public content folder containing the important
things shared both on public channels and in private channels is
securely filed:
I
have not received any response of corrective normalcy of leaderships in
tenancy management resolve - only continued complaints of dismissal to
not direct them communications or else I am in jeopardy of my tenancy
by harassment claims. Well, if you don't want to hear it in private, you
will hear it in public none the less it is truth.
This was
expressed just a short few months to my arrival here in the community
of Denver Colorado with my tenancy start of April 1St 2015.
Again,
I feel I am under attack from powers that are absolutely confused by my
intents and motivations future forward. I intend no harm to one who
does not harm me, and even then, I intend no harm on them. Just an
understanding. But I have been greatly harmed. If I am harmed, in a very
serious way, this community harmed me to silence. This I say is the
fact. For I am a gentle soul with a gentle mind with a gentle heart and
one quite true MOST UNIQUE CYBER IDENTITY TO EVER EXIST ON OUR PLANET.
In such, I will make some angry or upset with me or even take it to the
next level and harass me. I will need a commitment of where I should go,
should I need to take action beyond just simple mischievousness as I
told you happened the other night. If it gets more serious, I will let
you know. Thank you.
Additional for the record to save - the email presented in this video is filed here:
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku : Morning Joe MSNBC Published on Mar 12, 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97ryS...
Sandy
and Todd discuss the steps you need to take when you want to evict a
tenant that is not be paying rent or is causing a disturbance.
Todd
Rothbard has practiced exclusively in the area of landlord-tenant law
since 1975. He has handled over 100,000 unlawful detainer actions on
behalf of both commercial and residential landlords. Mr. Rothbard is the
Bay Area's leading authority on eviction issues. For more information
on Todd Rothbard and his services, visit: http://toddrothbardlaw.com/home.html
Presidential
Real Estate, committed to providing excellent customer service through
high standards and professionalism. For more information about
Presidential Real Estate and their services, visit: http://presidentialpm.com/ John@Presidentialpm.com (408) 829-8155 CalBRE #: 01512831
In the criminal law of many nations, necessity may be either a possible justification or an exculpation for breaking the law. Defendants seeking to rely on this defense argue that they should not be held liable for their actions as a crime because their conduct was necessary to prevent some greater harm and when that conduct is not excused under some other more specific provision of law such as self defense. Except for a few statutory exemptions and in some medical cases [1] there is no corresponding defense in English law for murder.[2]
For example, a drunk driver might contend that he drove his car to get away from a kidnap (cf. North by Northwest). Most common law and civil lawjurisdictions
recognize this defense, but only under limited circumstances.
Generally, the defendant must affirmatively show (i.e., introduce some
evidence) that (a) the harm he sought to avoid outweighs the danger of
the prohibited conduct he is charged with; (b) he had no reasonable
alternative; (c) he ceased to engage in the prohibited conduct as soon
as the danger passed; and (d) he did not himself create the danger he
sought to avoid. Thus, with the "drunk driver" example cited above, the
necessity defense will not be recognized if the defendant drove further
than was reasonably necessary to get away from the kidnapper, or if some
other reasonable alternative was available to him. However case law suggests necessity is narrowed to medical cases.
Necessity as a defense to criminal acts conducted to meet political ends was rejected in the case of United States v. Schoon.[3] In that case, 30 people, including appellants, gained admittance to the IRS
office in Tucson, where they chanted "keep America's tax dollars out of
El Salvador," splashed simulated blood on the counters, walls, and
carpeting, and generally obstructed the office's operation. The court
ruled that the elements of necessity did not exist in this case.[4]
As
a matter of political expediency, states usually allow some classes of
person to be excused from liability when they are engaged in socially
useful functions but intentionally cause injury, loss or damage. For
example, the fire services and other civil defenceorganizations have a general duty to keep the community
safe from harm. If a fire or flood is threatening to spread out of
control, it may be reasonably necessary to destroy other property to
form a fire break,
or to trespass on land to throw up mounds of earth to prevent the water
from spreading. These examples have the common feature of individuals
intentionally breaking the law because they believe it to be urgently
necessary to protect others from harm, but some states distinguish
between a response to a crisis arising from an entirely natural cause
(an inanimate force of nature), e.g. a fire from a lightning strike or
rain from a storm, and a response to an entirely human crisis. Thus, parents who lack the financial means to feed their children
cannot use necessity as a defense if they steal food. The existence of
welfare benefits and strategies other than self-help defeat the claim of
an urgent necessity that cannot be avoided in any way other than by
breaking the law. Further, some states apply a test of proportionality.
So the defense would only be allowed where the degree of harm actually
caused was a reasonably proportionate response to the degree of harm
threatened. This is a legal form of cost–benefit analysis.
Emergency law/right (nødret, nødrett) is the equivalent of necessity in Denmark and Norway.[5][6]
It is considered related to but separate from self-defence. Common
legal examples of necessity includes: breaking windows and other objects
in order to escape a fire, commandeering a vehicle to serve as an
emergency ambulance, ignoring traffic rules while rushing a dying
patient to a hospital, and even killing a person who poses an immediate
threat to several other people not including yourself. In the last case
self-defense laws are not enough, but the case is covered by nødret. Nødret can only be invoked though when no other option is available.
International law
Customary international law
Under international law, an obligation of customary international law
or an obligation granted under a bilateral investment treaty may be
suspended under the doctrine of necessity. It is "an exception from
illegality and in certain cases even as an exception from
responsibility." See Continental Casualty Company v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/03/09.
In order to invoke the doctrine of necessity: (1) The invoking State
must not have contributed to the state of necessity, (2) Actions taken
were the only way to safeguard an essential interest from grave and
impending danger. Id. at page 72, paragraph 165.
Taiwan, Republic of China
Necessity is a possible defense per the Criminal Code[7] and the Administrative Penalty Act.[8]
Christie, The Defense of Necessity Considered from the Legal and Moral Points of View, (1999) Vol. 48 Duke Law Journal, 975.
Fuller, Lon L. The Case of the Speluncean Explorers, (1949) Vol. 62, No. 4 Harvard Law Review [1] and The Case of the Speluncean Explorers: A Fiftieth Anniversary Symposium, (1999) 12 Harvard Law Review 1834.
Herman, United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyer's Cooperative. Whatever Happened to Federalism? (2002) Vol. 95, No. 1 The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 121.
Travis, M. The Compulsion Element in a Defence of Necessity (2000) [2]
See Re A (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation) [2001] Fam 147
Cavallaro, James L., Jr. (1993), The demise of the political necessity defense: indirect civil disobedience and United States v. Schoon, University of California Press, ISSN0008-1221
I
am requesting that everyone now refer to me by my middle name as my
primary name is reference to my peace building efforts in relation to
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
I was born on September 1st 1965 in San Bernardino CA,
By given real legal given at birth is
James [ First ] Martin [ Middle ] Driskill [ Last ]
I was of the fetal age of 3 months when the history of race relations in the United States historical events.
